Archive for March, 2009

Visalia Times-Delta: Paul Hurley Interview

Monday, March 30th, 2009

This interview features Paul Hurley, a senior editor for the Visalia Times-Delta (a newspaper company located in Central California). Paul was gracious enough to spare some time and answer some questions via email, and he did so very impressively. I am planning to break the interview up into a two-part post. You’ll be able to read the second half of the interview next week.

The Goods (Part I)

Luis Bonilla: You work for the Visalia Times-Delta. Please share with us your job title and the type of work you do for the newspaper company. Also, you mentioned to me that you teach journalism. Is there a specific niche of journalism that you instruct to your students?

Paul Hurley: I am the senior editor for Community Conversation for www.VisaliaTimesDelta.com. They used to call me the Opinion editor. I would write the editorials, edit letters and columns, select other features for the Opinion page, such as the cartoon, and occasionally contribute a column.

But the newspaper business is changing rapidly. Everything is going online. Like other newspaper companies, we are trying to attract readers to our Web site. My job is now to stimulate and promote interaction with the newspaper, not just through letters in print, but online through blogs, story comments, polls, and other feedback. So I also write a blog now for the Web site, manage the forums, set up blogs and recruit new bloggers, etc.

We also have an innovative program at the Times-Delta called 210 Connect. A local church, First Presbyterian, bought a vacant building downtown, 210 Center Avenue, and renovated it into a meeting place/cafe. It has a number of spaces for meetings, concerts, and other events.

Once a month, we hold an open public forum on a single subject at 210. We invite experts to address the topic and the public to engage in conversation. We have a person blog simultaneously on our Web site so the conversation is continued there. And we encourage others to comment and get involved. We have had forums on faith, growth, the foreclosure crisis, hunger, water quality, and others. Several members of the community have initiated different actions in response to our forums.

As for advising students: Yes, I have taught journalism for about the past 10 years, off and on, at a local community college. One course is for aspiring reporters. I advise them to obtain all the communication skills they can, including electronic ones, as well as experience in blogging, editing, video, and Web page maintenance. The future of daily journalism is clearly going digital.

LB: What initially persuaded you into the media industry?

PH: I like expressing myself in print, had studied English and enjoyed the stress of writing daily and on deadline. It’s also a great way to learn about issues, people, the environment, and everything else.

LB: You mentioned in an email that the newspaper industry is basically on its last legs. Do you feel that there will come a time when newspapers will be come obsolete because of the Internet? What about print media as a whole?

PH: Print media will survive, but it will probably become a specialty product or a niche product. Instantaneous digital transmission has too many advantages over print for print to remain an effective form for news, where the latest information determines the value of the product. Newspapers, and other print media, will adjust so that they contain depth and analysis that isn’t affordable through online or digital transmission.

Print will also continue to be valuable for its graphic capability, portability, and personal impact. People will end up paying more, however, for what will become more and more an elite as opposed to a mass medium.

LB: Do you think that the Internet, with the advent of blogs and forums that anyone can write, has watered down what’s considered reliable news? Has the accessibility of “publishable” material on the Internet changed how the consumer expects information?

PH: Nicholas Kristof had a great column in the New York Times last week entitled “The Daily Me.” It’s not an original idea, but he proposed that, as people rely more and more on blogs and online news reporting that is tailored to their interests, they will also become less likely to discover or accept other points of view. The result is a populace consuming media that merely confirms their beliefs (or prejudices) and avoids having those beliefs challenged by media with a wider scope.

You can see that happening already: Conservatives watch Fox News. Liberals watch MSNBC. People consume the media expression that they are most comfortable with and that is the one that confirms their beliefs.

Obviously, this is dangerous in a democracy as a society that relishes the free exchange of ideas, but you can see it politically in the polarization of the nation into “red” versus “blue.”

I believe the pendulum will start to swing back once we have traveled so far down the road of mindless partisanship that people begin to realize that their ideas are worthless if they are not challenged by the opposition. Imagine this country if there had no Hamilton to answer Jefferson or vice versa?

People have always had junk news alongside “serious” news, and when the issue gets important, they have always recognized the difference. So I am not worried that blogging will “water down” the news. There are really only a minuscule fraction of successful bloggers out there compared to the total number of blogs, and some of them are actually good.

It won’t be long that people recognize that there is no substitute for critical thinking: Just because you have a computer and screen name doesn’t make you a respected critic; your gut instincts are no substitute for learning and experience; buying a movie ticket doesn’t give you the credentials to comment on “Duplicity” to a wider audience than your wife and your dog.

Interview Intermission

As mentioned before, the conclusion of the interview will follow next Monday. I would like to thank Paul for his insights on both print and online media. If you have any comments on what is posted so far, please feel free to leave a comment below.

Ghostwriting Service - Copy Editing ServiceLuis D. Bonilla
luis@wordszilla.com
Wordszilla, LLC

The English Guru

Monday, March 9th, 2009

What’s Up, Wordy?

I’ve had this happen to me on numerous occasions, but last week’s occurrence made me question why it transpires. Due to the fact I have an English degree (or that some consider me a writer or editor), I have to be able to recite every single rule of grammar, know how to spell and remember the definition of every word, and never mess up while writing or speaking. Why?

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m flattered that most of the people that know me come to me for advice about these things or expect this kind of perfection, but from time to time I might not be able to come through. I know, I know…I can feel your disappointment via the Web.

So, I’m not so much upset at this (unless you want to tell me, “But I thought you were an English major?” after I mess up), but I’m more curious. I’m curious to know if there are any other industries or professions that generate the same type of you-need-to-know-everything mentality from others. I thought about this for a while and came up with a small list of vocations that, if someone were to do for a living, I would expect near flawlessness (with my letdown in parenthesis).

  • The psychologist/therapist/counselor (who will not follow their own “good” advice)
  • The dancer/choreographer (who is clumsy while walking down the street)
  • The fitness personal trainer (who loves to eat junk food)
  • The artist/painter (who cannot tell the difference between pink and magenta)

I know there are others, but these examples are loosely based on individuals I’ve met in life. However, I would like to hear your experiences with this topic. Are you a writer that has others expecting you to be a cross between Merriam-Webster and Google? Are you within a different industry with similar expectations of excellence? Please leave a comment below and tell us your story.

P.S. One great thing about my trade is that I can mess up two plus two and say, “Sorry, I’m just an English major” and people will nod their head affirmatively and respond, “Oh, okay” and all is forgiven. Wait. That’s not a good thing, is it?

Ghostwriting Service - Copy Editing Service
Luis D. Bonilla
luis@wordszilla.com
Wordszilla, LLC

Typos, HTML Mistakes, and Your Website

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

What’s Up, Wordy?

I’ve noticed that some websites have mistakes in their text, but it doesn’t have to do with the person who wrote it. Many times, it seems that the webmaster or individual who copied the text onto the actual webpage is the one who made the wrong keystrokes.

Perhaps there are two or three spaces in between words or you have an incorrect HTML code for a symbol (i.e., the ampersand or a copyright character). Items such as these may not derive from the writer of the content, but they will still be flaws when read by your website’s visitors.

Here are some tips that I’ve come up with to help prevent typos and mistakes in HTML:

  • Brush up on your HTML knowledge and understand what each tag is capable of doing.
  • After you make changes to your webpage, save it and then refresh your website to view the updates. You’ll then be able to see exactly what has occurred and fix the errors.
  • Have someone else read over the webpage. After staring at the website for so long, you might not be able to catch mistakes. Fresh eyes and another point of view are very helpful.

Do you have any other ideas on how to avoid HTML code mistakes? Leave a message below and share your thoughts.

Ghostwriting Service - Copy Editing Service
Luis D. Bonilla
luis@wordszilla.com
Wordszilla, LLC